This phenomenon complicates the interpretation of tax return data. For example, when one looks at the growth of the 1 percent, or the 0.1 percent, in the Piketty-Saez data, that growth is likely exaggerated because some income is merely being shifted from corporate returns. I don't know how much. If someone has already quantified the magnitude of this effect, please email me the answer. If not, someone should write that paper.
Click on graphic to enlarge.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder